https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376452 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue's appeal on all grounds. The Tribunal found that the assessee had adequately proven the land's agricultural use, justified commission payments, and explained the routine stock shortage, leading to the deletions of additions challenged by the Revenue. The Tribunal concluded that the A.O.'s disallowances lacked merit, supporting the CIT(A)'s favorable rulings for the assessee. en-us Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Mar 2019 07:50:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376452 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue's appeal on all grounds. The Tribunal found that the assessee had adequately proven the land's agricultural use, justified commission payments, and explained the routine stock shortage, leading to the deletions of additions challenged by the Revenue. The Tribunal concluded that the A.O.'s disallowances lacked merit, supporting the CIT(A)'s favorable rulings for the assessee. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376452