<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 472 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376451</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in challenges against penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for assessment years 2007-2008 and 2008-2009. For 2007-2008, penalty was canceled as income was assessed on an estimated basis without findings of concealment. In 2008-2009, the penalty was canceled due to an inadequate notice lacking specific grounds. The decisions highlighted the importance of proper notice and absence of evidence for concealment, leading to the cancellation of penalties for both assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2019 07:50:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 472 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376451</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in challenges against penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for assessment years 2007-2008 and 2008-2009. For 2007-2008, penalty was canceled as income was assessed on an estimated basis without findings of concealment. In 2008-2009, the penalty was canceled due to an inadequate notice lacking specific grounds. The decisions highlighted the importance of proper notice and absence of evidence for concealment, leading to the cancellation of penalties for both assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>