<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 464 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376443</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all the appeals, deleting the additions made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act and the disallowances of commission expenditure. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of specific evidence, the burden of proof, and the principles of natural justice in adjudicating such cases. The decision was consistent with previous judgments upholding the genuineness of similar transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2019 07:49:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 464 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376443</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all the appeals, deleting the additions made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act and the disallowances of commission expenditure. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of specific evidence, the burden of proof, and the principles of natural justice in adjudicating such cases. The decision was consistent with previous judgments upholding the genuineness of similar transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>