<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 460 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376439</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of broadcasting companies from comparables, the inclusion of Creative Eye Limited, the use of the CUP method for distribution revenue, and the deletion of adjustments related to advertisement and sales promotion expenses. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 460 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376439</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of broadcasting companies from comparables, the inclusion of Creative Eye Limited, the use of the CUP method for distribution revenue, and the deletion of adjustments related to advertisement and sales promotion expenses. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>