<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1742 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279246</link>
    <description>Limited user access to a database for internal business use, together with related IT support, was held not to constitute royalty because no copyright rights or commercial exploitation rights in the underlying intellectual property were transferred. The receipt also did not amount to fee for technical services, as the arrangement did not make available technical knowledge, skill, know-how or processes under the India-Sweden tax treaty. Applying the distinction between a copyrighted article and copyright rights, the Tribunal treated the payment as outside the royalty and FTS provisions. The addition was deleted and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2019 07:01:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1742 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279246</link>
      <description>Limited user access to a database for internal business use, together with related IT support, was held not to constitute royalty because no copyright rights or commercial exploitation rights in the underlying intellectual property were transferred. The receipt also did not amount to fee for technical services, as the arrangement did not make available technical knowledge, skill, know-how or processes under the India-Sweden tax treaty. Applying the distinction between a copyrighted article and copyright rights, the Tribunal treated the payment as outside the royalty and FTS provisions. The addition was deleted and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>