<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1494 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279245</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for Assessment Year 2007-08 and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for Assessment Year 2009-10, upholding the project completion method for income recognition in line with the assessee&#039;s business as a real estate developer. The Tribunal determined that the assessee&#039;s business nature as a real estate developer justified the use of the project completion method over the percentage completion method advocated by the Revenue, emphasizing the importance of consistently following a recognized accounting method.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2019 07:01:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1494 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279245</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for Assessment Year 2007-08 and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for Assessment Year 2009-10, upholding the project completion method for income recognition in line with the assessee&#039;s business as a real estate developer. The Tribunal determined that the assessee&#039;s business nature as a real estate developer justified the use of the project completion method over the percentage completion method advocated by the Revenue, emphasizing the importance of consistently following a recognized accounting method.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>