https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279254 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the termination of the petitioner's contractual services as Director with Goa Shipyard Ltd. It held that the Delhi High Court lacked territorial jurisdiction as the termination order was communicated to the petitioner in Goa, where part of the cause of action arose. The court emphasized the necessity of communication for an order to be legally effective, distinguishing the case from prior judgments. The petitioner was advised to seek recourse in a court with proper territorial jurisdiction. en-us Thu, 01 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Mar 2019 07:01:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279254 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the termination of the petitioner's contractual services as Director with Goa Shipyard Ltd. It held that the Delhi High Court lacked territorial jurisdiction as the termination order was communicated to the petitioner in Goa, where part of the cause of action arose. The court emphasized the necessity of communication for an order to be legally effective, distinguishing the case from prior judgments. The petitioner was advised to seek recourse in a court with proper territorial jurisdiction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 01 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279254