<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (5) TMI 269 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279239</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court quashed the seniority list dated 14th August 1975 and the Rules of 1976, directing a new seniority list based on continuous officiation length. It ordered reconsideration of promotional opportunities for Assistant Engineers based on revised seniority to resolve the dispute and ensure fairness in seniority and promotions within the Central Public Works Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 16:54:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (5) TMI 269 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279239</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court quashed the seniority list dated 14th August 1975 and the Rules of 1976, directing a new seniority list based on continuous officiation length. It ordered reconsideration of promotional opportunities for Assistant Engineers based on revised seniority to resolve the dispute and ensure fairness in seniority and promotions within the Central Public Works Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>