https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279237 SC held that a writ of mandamus would not lie to compel continuation of a levy sugar retail agency where the relationship arose from a contract expressly permitting termination on notice. The petitioners had no independent legal right to insist on continued appointment or to trade in levy sugar as of right. The State's policy of replacing private retailers with co-operative or model shops was directed to distribution efficiency and did not amount to illegal discrimination merely because some retailers were replaced earlier than others. The challenge to termination therefore failed. en-us Thu, 25 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Mar 2019 16:22:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279237 SC held that a writ of mandamus would not lie to compel continuation of a levy sugar retail agency where the relationship arose from a contract expressly permitting termination on notice. The petitioners had no independent legal right to insist on continued appointment or to trade in levy sugar as of right. The State's policy of replacing private retailers with co-operative or model shops was directed to distribution efficiency and did not amount to illegal discrimination merely because some retailers were replaced earlier than others. The challenge to termination therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279237