https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376400 The court quashed the garnishee orders issued by respondent No.1 due to discrepancies in service tax payments by the petitioner. The court found the initiation of recovery proceedings without resolving objections or issuing a show cause notice for the specific amount improper. The petitioner was directed to respond to the objections within two weeks, emphasizing the importance of following proper procedure and legal requirements in recovery proceedings under the Finance Act, 1994. en-us Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376400 The court quashed the garnishee orders issued by respondent No.1 due to discrepancies in service tax payments by the petitioner. The court found the initiation of recovery proceedings without resolving objections or issuing a show cause notice for the specific amount improper. The petitioner was directed to respond to the objections within two weeks, emphasizing the importance of following proper procedure and legal requirements in recovery proceedings under the Finance Act, 1994. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376400