<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 417 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376396</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties under Section 76 of the Act against the appellant for failure to pay service tax within the specified time, despite later depositing the tax liability with interest. The appellant&#039;s casual approach to appeal rights and failure to deposit collected service tax led to the penalty confirmation. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the penalties imposed and emphasizing compliance with statutory service tax payment obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 08:08:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 417 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376396</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties under Section 76 of the Act against the appellant for failure to pay service tax within the specified time, despite later depositing the tax liability with interest. The appellant&#039;s casual approach to appeal rights and failure to deposit collected service tax led to the penalty confirmation. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the penalties imposed and emphasizing compliance with statutory service tax payment obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>