<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 411 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376390</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, holding that the disputed plates used in manufacturing Ready Mix Concrete qualified as inputs under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The plates were considered as inputs since they were used in the manufacturing process within the factory, and they did not fall under the excluded category of goods. Therefore, the denial of Cenvat Credit by the authorities was overturned, and the appellant was entitled to claim the credit for the central excise duty paid on the plates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 08:08:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 411 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376390</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, holding that the disputed plates used in manufacturing Ready Mix Concrete qualified as inputs under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The plates were considered as inputs since they were used in the manufacturing process within the factory, and they did not fall under the excluded category of goods. Therefore, the denial of Cenvat Credit by the authorities was overturned, and the appellant was entitled to claim the credit for the central excise duty paid on the plates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>