<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 397 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376376</link>
    <description>The court affirmed that the incentives received were capital receipts, not to be adjusted towards the cost of acquisition of capital assets. It also upheld existing jurisprudence on Section 14A disallowances, following the decision in HDFC Bank Ltd. The court dismissed all appeals in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 17:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 397 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376376</link>
      <description>The court affirmed that the incentives received were capital receipts, not to be adjusted towards the cost of acquisition of capital assets. It also upheld existing jurisprudence on Section 14A disallowances, following the decision in HDFC Bank Ltd. The court dismissed all appeals in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>