<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 386 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376365</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the carry forward of the deficit of Rs. 14,30,11,390/- to subsequent years. The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the assessee was entitled to carry forward the excess expenditure over income to be set off against the income of subsequent years, in line with the Bombay High Court&#039;s judgment and other supporting case laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 386 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376365</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the carry forward of the deficit of Rs. 14,30,11,390/- to subsequent years. The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the assessee was entitled to carry forward the excess expenditure over income to be set off against the income of subsequent years, in line with the Bombay High Court&#039;s judgment and other supporting case laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>