<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1741 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279210</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 62,67,610 made by the A.O. The ITAT directed the CIT(A) to first analyze the facts of the case, apply legal precedents, and provide a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to be heard. The decision highlighted the necessity of considering facts before legal principles to ensure a fair and well-reasoned judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 06:55:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1741 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279210</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 62,67,610 made by the A.O. The ITAT directed the CIT(A) to first analyze the facts of the case, apply legal precedents, and provide a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to be heard. The decision highlighted the necessity of considering facts before legal principles to ensure a fair and well-reasoned judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>