<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1648 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279209</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2010-11 due to violations in clause (e) of Section 80IB(10). However, it allowed a pro-rata deduction under Section 80IB(10) for units not violating the clause, emphasizing adherence to the Act&#039;s provisions. The Tribunal remitted the deduction decision to the Assessing Officer for a pro-rata determination, partially granting the assessee&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 06:55:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1648 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279209</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2010-11 due to violations in clause (e) of Section 80IB(10). However, it allowed a pro-rata deduction under Section 80IB(10) for units not violating the clause, emphasizing adherence to the Act&#039;s provisions. The Tribunal remitted the deduction decision to the Assessing Officer for a pro-rata determination, partially granting the assessee&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>