<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 116 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17180</link>
    <description>The High Court of Delhi dismissed the petitioner&#039;s request to quash the order rejecting his plea for compounding offences under section 276CC of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court ruled that the petitioner should have approached the Chief Commissioner or Director-General, not the Central Board of Direct Taxes directly, as the Board&#039;s power was limited to issuing general guidelines, not individual case-specific directions. The court emphasized that the petitioner&#039;s misunderstanding of jurisdictional rules led to the dismissal of the petition and advised him to follow the correct procedure for seeking compounding of offences under the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:20:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 116 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17180</link>
      <description>The High Court of Delhi dismissed the petitioner&#039;s request to quash the order rejecting his plea for compounding offences under section 276CC of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court ruled that the petitioner should have approached the Chief Commissioner or Director-General, not the Central Board of Direct Taxes directly, as the Board&#039;s power was limited to issuing general guidelines, not individual case-specific directions. The court emphasized that the petitioner&#039;s misunderstanding of jurisdictional rules led to the dismissal of the petition and advised him to follow the correct procedure for seeking compounding of offences under the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>