<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 375 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376354</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal partially, directing the assessing officer to treat the USA property as deemed let out and determine the ALV accordingly. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision on the period of holding for the Gurgaon property, confirming it as a long-term capital gain. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 07:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 375 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376354</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal partially, directing the assessing officer to treat the USA property as deemed let out and determine the ALV accordingly. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision on the period of holding for the Gurgaon property, confirming it as a long-term capital gain. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>