<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 370 - THE NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376349</link>
    <description>The Authority found that the company did not engage in profiteering as it passed on the benefit of the tax rate reduction to its customers, complying with Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. The application alleging profiteering was dismissed, and the case was to be closed after notifying all relevant parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 17:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 370 - THE NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376349</link>
      <description>The Authority found that the company did not engage in profiteering as it passed on the benefit of the tax rate reduction to its customers, complying with Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. The application alleging profiteering was dismissed, and the case was to be closed after notifying all relevant parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>