<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 366 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376345</link>
    <description>The High Court held in favor of the appellant, ruling that the appellant was entitled to exemption under Section 10(23G) for liquidated damages as they fell under the definition of &quot;interest&quot; in the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the court determined that the deduction under Section 36(1)(viia)(c) should be calculated independently without reducing the income by the deduction under Section 36(1)(viii). The court allowed the Tax Case Appeal with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 366 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376345</link>
      <description>The High Court held in favor of the appellant, ruling that the appellant was entitled to exemption under Section 10(23G) for liquidated damages as they fell under the definition of &quot;interest&quot; in the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the court determined that the deduction under Section 36(1)(viia)(c) should be calculated independently without reducing the income by the deduction under Section 36(1)(viii). The court allowed the Tax Case Appeal with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>