<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 365 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376344</link>
    <description>The Court granted the petitioner liberty to approach the Assessing Officer by paying 20% of the disputed demand and seek a stay of the impugned demand dated 27.12.2018 by filing an application under Section 220 (3) or 220 (6) of the Income Tax Act. The Writ Petition was disposed of with no order as to costs, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 365 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376344</link>
      <description>The Court granted the petitioner liberty to approach the Assessing Officer by paying 20% of the disputed demand and seek a stay of the impugned demand dated 27.12.2018 by filing an application under Section 220 (3) or 220 (6) of the Income Tax Act. The Writ Petition was disposed of with no order as to costs, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>