<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 338 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376317</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision confirming the levy of tax under Section 3(b) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, despite the lack of concrete evidence. The petitioner&#039;s argument that the job work activities did not require pricing details in delivery challans was dismissed. The Court emphasized the need for a re-examination by the Assessing Officer to consider the job work aspect and documents without focusing solely on material value. The Tribunal&#039;s justification for confirming the tax levy on job work without a written agreement was set aside, and the matter was remanded for further assessment, allowing the petitioner to provide additional evidence and oral testimony.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 07:45:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 338 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376317</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision confirming the levy of tax under Section 3(b) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, despite the lack of concrete evidence. The petitioner&#039;s argument that the job work activities did not require pricing details in delivery challans was dismissed. The Court emphasized the need for a re-examination by the Assessing Officer to consider the job work aspect and documents without focusing solely on material value. The Tribunal&#039;s justification for confirming the tax levy on job work without a written agreement was set aside, and the matter was remanded for further assessment, allowing the petitioner to provide additional evidence and oral testimony.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>