https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376316 The court upheld the jurisdiction of the Board of Discipline of ICAI to proceed with the complaint against the petitioner, emphasizing that misconduct bringing disrepute to the profession falls within the Board's purview. The court clarified that disciplinary proceedings differ from criminal proceedings in terms of standards of proof, allowing the Board to assess allegations independently. Additionally, the court found no procedural impropriety in the disciplinary process, affirming the petitioner's right to appeal any decision. The petition was dismissed, and the court deferred to the Board of Discipline for further proceedings based on presented evidence. en-us Mon, 11 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Mar 2019 08:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376316 The court upheld the jurisdiction of the Board of Discipline of ICAI to proceed with the complaint against the petitioner, emphasizing that misconduct bringing disrepute to the profession falls within the Board's purview. The court clarified that disciplinary proceedings differ from criminal proceedings in terms of standards of proof, allowing the Board to assess allegations independently. Additionally, the court found no procedural impropriety in the disciplinary process, affirming the petitioner's right to appeal any decision. The petition was dismissed, and the court deferred to the Board of Discipline for further proceedings based on presented evidence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376316