<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 330 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376309</link>
    <description>Payments for erection, commissioning and repair services rendered abroad for wind-power projects were treated as taxable in India as technical or consultancy services, so the withholding obligation and section 201 consequences were sustained. By contrast, consideration paid for software was characterised as a right to use software rather than royalty, and no default for tax deduction at source arose on that payment. Remittance for a wind-energy market study was also treated as taxable in India as consultancy or technical services, including information based on commercial experience, with withholding liability maintained. The appeal thus succeeded only on the software-payment issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 330 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376309</link>
      <description>Payments for erection, commissioning and repair services rendered abroad for wind-power projects were treated as taxable in India as technical or consultancy services, so the withholding obligation and section 201 consequences were sustained. By contrast, consideration paid for software was characterised as a right to use software rather than royalty, and no default for tax deduction at source arose on that payment. Remittance for a wind-energy market study was also treated as taxable in India as consultancy or technical services, including information based on commercial experience, with withholding liability maintained. The appeal thus succeeded only on the software-payment issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>