<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1350 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279169</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues, including the classification of lease rent income as income from house property, allowance of deduction under Section 80IB(10) on sale proceeds of Stilt Parking, deletion of suppressed value of closing stock, and deletion of addition on account of allocation of common expenditure to projects. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing legal precedents and consistent application of judicial principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 06:33:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1350 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279169</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues, including the classification of lease rent income as income from house property, allowance of deduction under Section 80IB(10) on sale proceeds of Stilt Parking, deletion of suppressed value of closing stock, and deletion of addition on account of allocation of common expenditure to projects. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing legal precedents and consistent application of judicial principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>