<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 130 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17172</link>
    <description>Section 4(2) of the Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975 applies only where family members already have a pre-existing right to a share on partition; it does not create a new share for a wife or daughter who had no such right under the applicable Hindu law. The Court followed the principle that property held by a sole coparcener remains separate property where no other coparcener exists. On that construction, the assessee&#039;s property could not be treated as joint family property, assessment as tenants-in-common was not sustainable, and no referable question of law arose from the Commissioner&#039;s refusal to make a reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:51:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 130 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17172</link>
      <description>Section 4(2) of the Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975 applies only where family members already have a pre-existing right to a share on partition; it does not create a new share for a wife or daughter who had no such right under the applicable Hindu law. The Court followed the principle that property held by a sole coparcener remains separate property where no other coparcener exists. On that construction, the assessee&#039;s property could not be treated as joint family property, assessment as tenants-in-common was not sustainable, and no referable question of law arose from the Commissioner&#039;s refusal to make a reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>