<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1617 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279193</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed both appeals challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order on depreciation and deficit carry forward for Assessment Years 2010-11 and 2011-12. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the respondent assessee, citing a settled legal position established by the Apex Court. The appeals were rejected as the proposed questions lacked substantial legal merit, leading to the dismissal of the appeals without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 06:33:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1617 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279193</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed both appeals challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order on depreciation and deficit carry forward for Assessment Years 2010-11 and 2011-12. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the respondent assessee, citing a settled legal position established by the Apex Court. The appeals were rejected as the proposed questions lacked substantial legal merit, leading to the dismissal of the appeals without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>