<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 861 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279160</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D due to lack of claim regarding borrowed money. The addition u/s 41(1) was sent back to the Assessing Officer for verification to avoid double assessment. Sales promotion expenses were partially disallowed, with gifts deemed personal and the remaining amount requiring detailed explanation. The appeal was partly allowed, instructing the AO to issue a speaking order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 12:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 861 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279160</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D due to lack of claim regarding borrowed money. The addition u/s 41(1) was sent back to the Assessing Officer for verification to avoid double assessment. Sales promotion expenses were partially disallowed, with gifts deemed personal and the remaining amount requiring detailed explanation. The appeal was partly allowed, instructing the AO to issue a speaking order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>