<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 22 - HIMACHAL PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17155</link>
    <description>Reopening of an estate duty assessment based only on an audit objection was invalid because no fresh factual material had been received by the assessing authority. The High Court treated the attempted reassessment as a mere change of opinion on the same material, and held that an internal audit party&#039;s view on a point of law is not &quot;information&quot; for reopening purposes. In the absence of any new information or statutory basis to compel reopening in that manner, the reassessment was quashed and the challenge succeeded against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:18:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 22 - HIMACHAL PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17155</link>
      <description>Reopening of an estate duty assessment based only on an audit objection was invalid because no fresh factual material had been received by the assessing authority. The High Court treated the attempted reassessment as a mere change of opinion on the same material, and held that an internal audit party&#039;s view on a point of law is not &quot;information&quot; for reopening purposes. In the absence of any new information or statutory basis to compel reopening in that manner, the reassessment was quashed and the challenge succeeded against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>