<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 60 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17153</link>
    <description>The appellant, a banking company, challenged notices under section 133(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, requiring information on payments made outside India. The court found that as no proceeding was pending, the Income-tax Officer had no power to seek such information. Relying on precedents and the 1995 amendment to the Act, the court allowed the writ petition, quashing the notices. The appeal was allowed, with no costs awarded, as both judges concurred with the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:14:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 60 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17153</link>
      <description>The appellant, a banking company, challenged notices under section 133(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, requiring information on payments made outside India. The court found that as no proceeding was pending, the Income-tax Officer had no power to seek such information. Relying on precedents and the 1995 amendment to the Act, the court allowed the writ petition, quashing the notices. The appeal was allowed, with no costs awarded, as both judges concurred with the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>