<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 64 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17150</link>
    <description>For reopening an assessment under section 35 of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act, the five-year limitation runs from the end of the financial year, not from the end of the previous year in which the income was earned or received. The Act distinguishes the previous year from the financial year, and the charging scheme taxes income of the previous year in the assessment year. Because section 35 refers to escaped assessment in a financial year, the notice issued within five years from the end of the assessment year was within time. The Tribunal&#039;s contrary view on limitation was incorrect, and the reassessment proceedings were held valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:08:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 64 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17150</link>
      <description>For reopening an assessment under section 35 of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act, the five-year limitation runs from the end of the financial year, not from the end of the previous year in which the income was earned or received. The Act distinguishes the previous year from the financial year, and the charging scheme taxes income of the previous year in the assessment year. Because section 35 refers to escaped assessment in a financial year, the notice issued within five years from the end of the assessment year was within time. The Tribunal&#039;s contrary view on limitation was incorrect, and the reassessment proceedings were held valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>