<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 36 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17147</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee in a case concerning the deduction of a provision of Rs. 2 lakhs for contributions to an approved gratuity fund under section 40A(7)(b)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that the provision did not meet the requirement of being a sum that had become payable during the previous year, thus disallowing it as a deduction. The court did not address the admissibility of the ad hoc provision of Rs. 2 lakhs under rule 4(2) of Part C of Schedule IV, returning that question unanswered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:01:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 36 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17147</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee in a case concerning the deduction of a provision of Rs. 2 lakhs for contributions to an approved gratuity fund under section 40A(7)(b)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that the provision did not meet the requirement of being a sum that had become payable during the previous year, thus disallowing it as a deduction. The court did not address the admissibility of the ad hoc provision of Rs. 2 lakhs under rule 4(2) of Part C of Schedule IV, returning that question unanswered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>