https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376289 The court ruled that the former director cannot be held personally liable for the company's dues as there is no specific statutory provision imposing such liability under the Customs Act or relevant rules. The demand notice requiring payment from the director was quashed, allowing authorities to pursue recovery from the company and its assets instead. The judgment reiterated that directors are not personally liable for company debts unless expressly mandated by law. en-us Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Jun 2019 11:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376289 The court ruled that the former director cannot be held personally liable for the company's dues as there is no specific statutory provision imposing such liability under the Customs Act or relevant rules. The demand notice requiring payment from the director was quashed, allowing authorities to pursue recovery from the company and its assets instead. The judgment reiterated that directors are not personally liable for company debts unless expressly mandated by law. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376289