<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 309 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376288</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Tribunal transferred proceedings from the New Delhi Bench to the Jaipur Bench due to territorial jurisdiction. An Operational Creditor claimed payment for PVC pipes supplied to the Corporate Debtor, who disputed the quality of goods. The dispute over goods quality was central, with the Corporate Debtor asserting a genuine dispute defense. The judgment analyzed the definition of &#039;Dispute&#039; under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, emphasizing the importance of resolving quality disputes in adjudicating claims. The decision provided insights into legal interpretations and obligations regarding disputes in insolvency proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 06:47:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 309 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376288</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Tribunal transferred proceedings from the New Delhi Bench to the Jaipur Bench due to territorial jurisdiction. An Operational Creditor claimed payment for PVC pipes supplied to the Corporate Debtor, who disputed the quality of goods. The dispute over goods quality was central, with the Corporate Debtor asserting a genuine dispute defense. The judgment analyzed the definition of &#039;Dispute&#039; under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, emphasizing the importance of resolving quality disputes in adjudicating claims. The decision provided insights into legal interpretations and obligations regarding disputes in insolvency proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>