https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376280 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that they were entitled to Cenvat Credit on purchased goods despite the activities not amounting to manufacture. The appellants had paid excise duty on the processed goods, clearing them on payment of duty as per Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules 2002. Since the duty paid equaled or exceeded the Cenvat Credit claimed, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal and related penalties. Compliance with Cenvat Credit and duty payment regulations was emphasized, resulting in a favorable outcome for the appellants. en-us Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Mar 2019 07:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376280 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that they were entitled to Cenvat Credit on purchased goods despite the activities not amounting to manufacture. The appellants had paid excise duty on the processed goods, clearing them on payment of duty as per Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules 2002. Since the duty paid equaled or exceeded the Cenvat Credit claimed, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal and related penalties. Compliance with Cenvat Credit and duty payment regulations was emphasized, resulting in a favorable outcome for the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376280