<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 296 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376275</link>
    <description>The judgment addressed issues concerning the assessment of wealth tax on a partially constructed building, monetary limits for filing appeals under the Income Tax Act, authorities&#039; discretion on substantial questions of law, and the application of the extant litigation policy. Despite the question of law favoring the Revenue, no recovery steps were deemed necessary as the appeals were below the monetary limit for filing, leading to the case being closed without further action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 06:34:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 296 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376275</link>
      <description>The judgment addressed issues concerning the assessment of wealth tax on a partially constructed building, monetary limits for filing appeals under the Income Tax Act, authorities&#039; discretion on substantial questions of law, and the application of the extant litigation policy. Despite the question of law favoring the Revenue, no recovery steps were deemed necessary as the appeals were below the monetary limit for filing, leading to the case being closed without further action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>