<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1349 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279146</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partially, directing the AO to re-examine the treatment of long-term capital gains on the sale of land, considering additional evidence. Additionally, the Tribunal instructed the deletion of the addition under Section 2(22)(e) for deemed dividend, as the assessee firm was not a shareholder of the payer company. The decision underscores the significance of accurately categorizing assets and the specific requirements for applying deemed dividend provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 06:32:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1349 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279146</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partially, directing the AO to re-examine the treatment of long-term capital gains on the sale of land, considering additional evidence. Additionally, the Tribunal instructed the deletion of the addition under Section 2(22)(e) for deemed dividend, as the assessee firm was not a shareholder of the payer company. The decision underscores the significance of accurately categorizing assets and the specific requirements for applying deemed dividend provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>