https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279145 The Court held in favor of the petitioner, ruling that the notice of reopening assessment issued beyond the prescribed 4-year period was invalid. The Assessing Officer's reasons for reopening had been previously considered during the original assessment, and the petitioner had fully disclosed all relevant information. The Court granted an adjournment until January 25, 2019, and temporarily stayed the challenged notice. en-us Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Mar 2019 06:32:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279145 The Court held in favor of the petitioner, ruling that the notice of reopening assessment issued beyond the prescribed 4-year period was invalid. The Assessing Officer's reasons for reopening had been previously considered during the original assessment, and the petitioner had fully disclosed all relevant information. The Court granted an adjournment until January 25, 2019, and temporarily stayed the challenged notice. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279145