<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1521 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279152</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Department&#039;s decision denying Small Scale Industries (SSI) exemption to the appellant company based on cash flow among associated firms. Despite commonalities in management and premises, the Tribunal found that the firms maintained separate manufacturing activities, issued separate bills, and complied with tax regulations independently. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the distinct nature of activities and proper financial adjustments made by the firms. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed both appeals filed by the appellant, concluding that the denial of SSI exemption was unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 06:32:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1521 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279152</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Department&#039;s decision denying Small Scale Industries (SSI) exemption to the appellant company based on cash flow among associated firms. Despite commonalities in management and premises, the Tribunal found that the firms maintained separate manufacturing activities, issued separate bills, and complied with tax regulations independently. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the distinct nature of activities and proper financial adjustments made by the firms. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed both appeals filed by the appellant, concluding that the denial of SSI exemption was unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>