<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 286 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376265</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeals partly for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to compute the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) by considering only investments yielding exempt income for expenses related to exempt income under section 14A of the Income Tax Act. This decision aimed to ensure consistency and fairness in determining such disallowances based on previous rulings and specific provisions of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 06:22:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 286 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376265</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeals partly for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to compute the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) by considering only investments yielding exempt income for expenses related to exempt income under section 14A of the Income Tax Act. This decision aimed to ensure consistency and fairness in determining such disallowances based on previous rulings and specific provisions of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>