<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 280 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376259</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the decisions of the lower authorities, emphasizing that the assessee adequately explained the source of cash found during the search operation, discharging the burden of proof imposed on him. The Tribunal disagreed with the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning and held that the assessee&#039;s explanation was acceptable, reversing the addition made under section 69A of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2019 09:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 280 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376259</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the decisions of the lower authorities, emphasizing that the assessee adequately explained the source of cash found during the search operation, discharging the burden of proof imposed on him. The Tribunal disagreed with the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning and held that the assessee&#039;s explanation was acceptable, reversing the addition made under section 69A of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>