<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 375 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279138</link>
    <description>Section 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is wide enough to cover freezing of bank accounts and other financial assets when investigation shows prima facie that the money was dishonestly obtained through fabricated documents and parked in accounts, lockers or investments in the names of accused persons or benamidars. Accounts held in fictitious names, under another identity, or in the names of close family members supported by alleged forged signatures supplied sufficient linkage to the offences, so the investigative agency could restrain their operation. The freezing directions were therefore within the lawful investigative power and warranted no interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 14:19:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 375 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279138</link>
      <description>Section 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is wide enough to cover freezing of bank accounts and other financial assets when investigation shows prima facie that the money was dishonestly obtained through fabricated documents and parked in accounts, lockers or investments in the names of accused persons or benamidars. Accounts held in fictitious names, under another identity, or in the names of close family members supported by alleged forged signatures supplied sufficient linkage to the offences, so the investigative agency could restrain their operation. The freezing directions were therefore within the lawful investigative power and warranted no interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>