<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 366 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279137</link>
    <description>Section 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure permits seizure of property suspected to be connected with an offence, but does not authorise police to issue blanket prohibitory directions to banks restraining operation of accounts. The article also notes that a return condition requiring petitioners to report the manner and quantity of use of seized building materials was excessive once the materials were released, so the reporting obligation was shifted to the Board. Refusal to return demand drafts linked to alleged fraudulent transactions was upheld because the investigation was continuing and the order was based on relevant considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 14:17:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 366 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279137</link>
      <description>Section 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure permits seizure of property suspected to be connected with an offence, but does not authorise police to issue blanket prohibitory directions to banks restraining operation of accounts. The article also notes that a return condition requiring petitioners to report the manner and quantity of use of seized building materials was excessive once the materials were released, so the reporting obligation was shifted to the Board. Refusal to return demand drafts linked to alleged fraudulent transactions was upheld because the investigation was continuing and the order was based on relevant considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>