https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279136 A criminal procedure commentary explains that a seizure order under Section 95 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 cannot extend to letters or parcels not yet received and therefore not in custody at the time of the order, and an open-ended reference to "etc." is too uncertain to define the items covered. It further states that Section 550 is confined to actual seizure of property capable of physical possession, so a bank deposit or debt relationship cannot be treated as seized property merely because payment is restrained. The wider postal restraint was limited to articles already in custody, and the bank order was quashed. en-us Mon, 09 Nov 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Mar 2019 14:13:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279136 A criminal procedure commentary explains that a seizure order under Section 95 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 cannot extend to letters or parcels not yet received and therefore not in custody at the time of the order, and an open-ended reference to "etc." is too uncertain to define the items covered. It further states that Section 550 is confined to actual seizure of property capable of physical possession, so a bank deposit or debt relationship cannot be treated as seized property merely because payment is restrained. The wider postal restraint was limited to articles already in custody, and the bank order was quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Nov 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279136