<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 263 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376242</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal and deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer. The first issue regarding the treatment of advancement of share application money as an international transaction under transfer pricing provisions was decided in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that interest-free advances for equity conversion do not constitute an international transaction. In the second issue, the disallowance of proportionate interest cost on borrowings under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act was also ruled in favor of the assessee, following legal principles that such expenditure for investments cannot be disallowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2019 16:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 263 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376242</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal and deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer. The first issue regarding the treatment of advancement of share application money as an international transaction under transfer pricing provisions was decided in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that interest-free advances for equity conversion do not constitute an international transaction. In the second issue, the disallowance of proportionate interest cost on borrowings under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act was also ruled in favor of the assessee, following legal principles that such expenditure for investments cannot be disallowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>