<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 245 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376224</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the service tax demands related to pure rental income and reimbursed rental charges for Clearing &amp;amp; Forwarding Agency Services. The Tribunal differentiated between rental income without services rendered and expenses reimbursed for services, ultimately concluding that only the latter was taxable. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 07:40:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 245 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376224</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the service tax demands related to pure rental income and reimbursed rental charges for Clearing &amp;amp; Forwarding Agency Services. The Tribunal differentiated between rental income without services rendered and expenses reimbursed for services, ultimately concluding that only the latter was taxable. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>