https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376212 Concealment of part of the invoice and the accompanying factual findings supported an inference of intent to evade tax, so penalty under Section 51(7)(c) of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 was sustained. The Tribunal also held that no offence under Section 51(12) was made out because the consignor and consignee details had been disclosed, and that finding was left undisturbed. In the absence of illegality or perversity in the concurrent factual findings, no substantial question of law arose for interference under the PVAT Act. en-us Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Mar 2019 07:39:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376212 Concealment of part of the invoice and the accompanying factual findings supported an inference of intent to evade tax, so penalty under Section 51(7)(c) of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 was sustained. The Tribunal also held that no offence under Section 51(12) was made out because the consignor and consignee details had been disclosed, and that finding was left undisturbed. In the absence of illegality or perversity in the concurrent factual findings, no substantial question of law arose for interference under the PVAT Act. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376212