<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 23 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17123</link>
    <description>The High Court of Kerala ruled in a wealth-tax case regarding the admissibility of gratuity liability as a deduction for valuing shares. The court held that gratuity liability shown in the balance-sheet is an admissible deduction under rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules. It emphasized that an existing and ascertained liability can be considered for deduction, distinguishing between provisions and reserves. The court sided with the assessee, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument based on statutory provisions. The court directed the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to act accordingly, settling the matter in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:12:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 23 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17123</link>
      <description>The High Court of Kerala ruled in a wealth-tax case regarding the admissibility of gratuity liability as a deduction for valuing shares. The court held that gratuity liability shown in the balance-sheet is an admissible deduction under rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules. It emphasized that an existing and ascertained liability can be considered for deduction, distinguishing between provisions and reserves. The court sided with the assessee, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument based on statutory provisions. The court directed the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal to act accordingly, settling the matter in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>