<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 217 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376196</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that roaming charges paid by the assessee to other telecom companies do not fall under &quot;fees for technical services&quot; under Section 194J of the Income Tax Act, as the process is automatic without human intervention. Therefore, the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source on these payments. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 07:33:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 217 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376196</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that roaming charges paid by the assessee to other telecom companies do not fall under &quot;fees for technical services&quot; under Section 194J of the Income Tax Act, as the process is automatic without human intervention. Therefore, the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source on these payments. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>