<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 209 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376188</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and the first and third assessees&#039; cross objections as infructuous. The second assessee&#039;s cross objection challenging the sustained penalty of Rs. 17 lakh was also dismissed. The tribunal confirmed that the penalty under Section 271AAB applies only in cases involving corresponding material indicating undisclosed income, rather than automatically following a search.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 07:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=561203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 209 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376188</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and the first and third assessees&#039; cross objections as infructuous. The second assessee&#039;s cross objection challenging the sustained penalty of Rs. 17 lakh was also dismissed. The tribunal confirmed that the penalty under Section 271AAB applies only in cases involving corresponding material indicating undisclosed income, rather than automatically following a search.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>